What will be the environmental impact assessments of the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia by end of 2026?
Significant negative impact • 25%
Moderate negative impact • 25%
Minimal negative impact • 25%
Positive impact • 25%
Reports from environmental organizations or government agencies
FIFA to Announce Saudi Arabia as Host for 2034 World Cup Amid Controversy Over Human Rights and Infantino's Role
Dec 11, 2024, 08:27 AM
FIFA is set to officially announce Saudi Arabia as the host of the 2034 World Cup, a decision that has sparked significant controversy. Critics have raised concerns regarding human rights issues, including LGBTQ+ and women's rights, as well as environmental considerations related to the event. The decision follows FIFA's earlier confirmation that the 2030 World Cup will be co-hosted by Spain, Portugal, and Morocco, marking a historic centenary celebration across three continents. Observers have described the bidding process for the 2034 tournament as opaque, with allegations of financial lobbying influencing the outcome. FIFA President Gianni Infantino's push for Saudi Arabia to host the event is viewed as a strategic success for the kingdom, which aims to use the tournament as a catalyst for change and growth despite the surrounding controversies.
View original story
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No initiatives • 25%
Comprehensive initiatives • 25%
Moderate initiatives • 25%
Minimal initiatives • 25%
Completed ahead of schedule • 25%
Delayed, partially completed • 25%
Completed on time • 25%
Delayed, significantly incomplete • 25%
Reversal of policies • 25%
No change • 25%
Minor reforms • 25%
Significant reforms • 25%
Other challenges • 25%
No significant challenges • 25%
Human rights issues • 25%
Environmental concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Human Rights Issues • 25%
Migrant Worker Safety • 25%
Environmental Concerns • 25%
Predominantly positive • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Predominantly negative • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Other • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Lack of infrastructure • 25%
Human rights violations • 25%
Environmental concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
More favorable • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
Less favorable • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Withdraw sponsorship • 25%
No public reaction • 25%
Increase sponsorship • 25%
Publicly express concern but continue sponsorship • 25%