What will be Jared Moskowitz's influence on FEMA's strategic direction by end of 2025?
Significant influence • 25%
Moderate influence • 25%
Minimal influence • 25%
No influence • 25%
Official FEMA strategy documents or credible news analysis
Trump Eyes Democrat Jared Moskowitz for FEMA, Aiming for Bipartisan Support
Dec 16, 2024, 08:26 PM
Democratic U.S. Representative Jared Moskowitz from Florida is reportedly a leading candidate to lead the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under President-elect Donald Trump. Moskowitz, who previously served as the director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management under Governor Ron DeSantis, has earned a reputation for his effective handling of emergency situations, earning the nickname 'Master of Disaster.' His experience includes nearly a decade at Ashbritt Inc., an emergency management company, before his state appointment. Moskowitz has been vocal about the need for replenishing FEMA funds, particularly in light of natural disasters affecting Florida. His potential appointment is seen as a strategic move by Trump to ensure bipartisan support for FEMA's operations and could pave the way for Moskowitz's future political ambitions in Florida.
View original story
Appointed to another role • 25%
Appointed as FEMA Director • 25%
Withdraws from consideration • 25%
Not appointed to any role • 25%
Another Democrat • 25%
Other • 25%
Jared Moskowitz • 25%
A Republican • 25%
Partial cooperation granted • 25%
No cooperation granted • 25%
Resolution pending • 25%
Full cooperation granted • 25%
Increased focus on vaccine safety • 25%
Narrower focus on infectious diseases • 25%
Continued broad public health focus • 25%
Other • 25%
Climate Change • 25%
Middle East Policy • 25%
Other • 25%
China Relations • 25%
Mixed impact • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Negative impact • 25%
Positive impact • 25%
Other • 25%
Crime Reduction • 25%
Consumer Protection • 25%
Civil Rights • 25%
Other • 25%
Major restructuring • 25%
Closure of Washington HQ • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Climate change initiatives • 25%
Reducing bureaucratic delays • 25%
Energy dominance • 25%
Wildfire recovery efforts • 25%
Mixed impact • 25%
Positive impact • 25%
Negative impact • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Withdrawn from consideration • 34%
Appointed • 33%
Not appointed • 33%