What is the outcome of investigations into Jabbar's use of Meta glasses for scouting by end of 2025?
Technology deemed critical to attack • 25%
Technology had no significant impact • 25%
Technology use inconclusive • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
FBI or Meta official statements
Army Veteran Jabbar Used Meta Glasses to Scout New Orleans Before Killing 14, FBI Says
Jan 5, 2025, 07:14 PM
Authorities have revealed that the man responsible for the New Year's Day truck attack in New Orleans, which killed 14 people, had visited the city twice before in October and November to scout locations. The attacker, identified as 42-year-old Army veteran Shamsud-Din Jabbar, used Meta-branded smart glasses to record hands-free video of the French Quarter during these visits, according to the FBI. The smart glasses, disguised as regular eyewear, allowed him to record and potentially livestream videos hands-free. On Sunday, FBI officials released video footage showing Jabbar wearing the smart glasses as he rode a bicycle through the area and placing coolers containing improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which did not detonate. The FBI is also investigating Jabbar's recent travels to Cairo, Egypt, from June 22 to July 2023, and Ontario, Canada, to determine if they are connected to the attack. The smart glasses were not recording during the actual attack, officials noted.
View original story
Connection to ISIS • 25%
Other • 25%
Source of explosive material • 25%
Details of radicalization process • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Meta found liable • 25%
Meta not found liable • 25%
No public conclusion • 25%
Not shared • 25%
Shared with individuals • 25%
Shared with a known organization • 25%
Unknown • 25%
No connection found • 25%
Connection to Egypt trip • 25%
Connection to Canada trip • 25%
Connection to both trips • 25%
Gifted by a third party • 25%
Other • 25%
Purchased legally • 25%
Acquired illegally • 25%
One or more associates identified • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
No associates identified • 25%
Under investigation • 25%
Other • 25%
Unrelated • 25%
Linked to radicalization • 25%
Other • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
No ties • 25%
Confirmed ties • 25%
No definitive conclusion • 25%
Part of larger network • 25%
Had accomplices • 25%
Acted completely alone • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Online radicalization • 25%
Other • 25%
Domestic extremist networks • 25%
Foreign travel influence • 25%
Political • 25%
Religious • 25%
Personal vendetta • 25%
Other • 25%
None identified • 25%
Domestic collaborators • 25%
International collaborators • 25%
Both domestic and international • 25%