What approach will Ronald Johnson take to address migrant crimes in Mexico by end of 2025?
Military cooperation • 25%
Bilateral agreements • 25%
Economic incentives • 25%
Strict enforcement • 25%
Policy documents and public statements from the U.S. Embassy in Mexico
Trump Nominates Green Beret Ronald Johnson as U.S. Ambassador to Mexico to End Migrant Crimes
Dec 11, 2024, 12:30 PM
President-elect Donald Trump has nominated Ronald Johnson, a retired U.S. Army colonel with Green Beret training, as the next U.S. Ambassador to Mexico. Trump's announcement emphasizes Johnson's role in promoting security and prosperity through U.S.-centric foreign policies. Johnson's military background, including his training as a Green Beret, is highlighted as key to addressing issues such as illegal migration and fentanyl trafficking, which are among Trump's priorities. Trump has also expressed his intention to work with Johnson to end crimes committed by migrants.
View original story
Moderate reduction in organized crime • 25%
No significant change in organized crime • 25%
Increase in organized crime • 25%
Significant reduction in organized crime • 25%
Fentanyl trafficking • 25%
Other • 25%
Trade agreements • 25%
Combating illegal migration • 25%
Security Cooperation • 25%
Trade Relations • 25%
Cultural Exchange Programs • 25%
Migration Policy • 25%
No change in relations • 25%
Strengthened relations • 25%
Some improvement in relations • 25%
Deterioration in relations • 25%
Deteriorated relations • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other • 25%
Increase in border security • 25%
Changes in immigration policy • 25%
Increased penalties for violence against agents • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
No cooperation with U.S. initiatives • 25%
Opposition to U.S. initiatives • 25%
Partial cooperation with U.S. initiatives • 25%
Full cooperation with U.S. initiatives • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic cooperation with Mexico • 25%
Designation as terrorist organizations • 25%
Military action • 25%
Increased policing • 25%
Deportation focus • 25%
Community programs • 25%
No change • 25%
Policy changes announced but not implemented • 25%
More lenient policies • 25%
Stricter policies • 25%
No change • 25%
Oppose • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No official stance • 25%
Support • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Improved relations • 25%
Deteriorated relations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Uncertain outcome • 25%
Diplomatic relations • 25%
Illegal migration • 25%
Fentanyl trafficking • 25%
Trade relations • 25%