U.S. government response to drone incidents at military bases by December 31, 2025?
New regulations • 25%
Increased military security measures • 25%
Public awareness campaign • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Official government announcements or legislative records
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Closes Airspace for Four Hours on December 13 Due to Drone Activity, Says Robert Purtiman
Dec 16, 2024, 04:52 PM
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, temporarily closed its airspace for approximately four hours late Friday night into early Saturday morning due to unauthorized drone activity. Base officials reported sightings of small unmanned aerial systems in the vicinity, prompting the airspace closure as a precautionary measure. Robert Purtiman, a spokesperson for the base, confirmed the incident, which has raised concerns among local residents and officials regarding the security implications of such drone incursions. This incident follows a series of similar drone sightings over military installations in other states, including New Jersey and New York, leading to increased scrutiny and calls for action from government officials to address the issue of unidentified drones in U.S. airspace.
View original story
No significant change • 25%
Military de-escalation • 25%
Diplomatic engagement • 25%
Sanctions on SDF • 25%
Deployment of counter-drone technology • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Increased surveillance • 25%
Increase Military Patrols • 25%
Strengthen Drone Laws • 25%
No Action • 25%
Deploy New Technology • 25%
Sanctions Imposed • 25%
Other Measures Implemented • 25%
No Action Taken • 25%
Diplomatic Talks Initiated • 25%
Deployment of anti-drone technology • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Public awareness campaign • 25%
Increased surveillance • 25%
No Action Taken • 25%
Increase Surveillance • 25%
Engage the Drones • 25%
Other Response • 25%
No Change • 25%
Stricter Regulations • 25%
Looser Regulations • 25%
Moderate Regulations • 25%
Other measures • 25%
Increased military surveillance • 25%
New drone legislation • 25%
No action taken • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic protest • 25%
Other • 25%
Reduction in support to SDF • 25%
Other • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Increased surveillance • 25%
Public safety measures • 25%
No action • 25%
Deployment of federal resources • 25%
New federal drone regulations • 25%
Increased funding for local enforcement • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Collaboration with local authorities • 25%
Other • 25%
Unknown • 25%
Individual hobbyists • 25%
Organized groups • 25%
Foreign entities • 25%