Public response to lawsuit against Mayor Adams on solitary confinement by mid-2025
Protests increase • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Support for Adams increases • 25%
Council support increases • 25%
Media reports or official announcements
NYC Council Sues Mayor Adams Over Executive Order Blocking Solitary Confinement Ban
Dec 9, 2024, 03:46 PM
The New York City Council, along with Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, has filed a lawsuit against Mayor Eric Adams over his executive order that blocks the implementation of a ban on solitary confinement in city jails. The lawsuit claims that Adams' action is an 'unprecedented' abuse of power and an overstep of his authority. The contention arises from Adams' emergency executive orders, which were issued to suspend parts of the law due to an alleged state of emergency caused by the imminent effective date of the ban. The Council and Williams argue that these orders are arbitrary and capricious, and they are seeking to invalidate them through legal action. They assert that Adams' orders exacerbate the human rights crisis on Rikers Island and perpetuate failed policies.
View original story
Majority opposition • 25%
Indifferent or unclear • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Evenly divided • 25%
Minimal attention • 25%
Moderate media coverage • 25%
Widespread public outcry • 25%
Policy changes proposed • 25%
Acquitted • 25%
Pardoned • 25%
Case Dismissed • 25%
Convicted • 25%
Unsuccessful challenge • 25%
Pending challenge • 25%
No legal challenge • 25%
Successful challenge • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Discussions ongoing without resolution • 25%
Full cooperation established • 25%
Partial cooperation established • 25%
No cooperation established • 25%
No further action • 25%
Settlements reached • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
Indictments issued • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No change in status • 25%
Executive order issued • 25%
City Council maintains status • 25%
Collaboration with Trump Administration • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Policies become stricter • 25%
New alternative policies introduced • 25%
No change in policies • 25%
Policies become more lenient • 25%