Apple Sued Over 'All-Seeing Eye' Policy; Employee Alleges Spying and Silencing
Dec 2, 2024, 09:31 PM
Apple is facing a lawsuit filed by a current employee who accuses the company of illegally monitoring employees' personal devices and iCloud accounts through what is referred to as an 'All-Seeing Eye' policy. The lawsuit alleges that Apple requires employees to install software on their personal devices, allowing the company to access personal emails, photo libraries, health data, and smart home data, even when they are at home. Additionally, the employee claims that Apple enforces policies that restrict workers from discussing pay and working conditions, effectively silencing them and violating their freedom of speech. The employee also alleges being forced to edit their LinkedIn profile. The lawsuit asserts that these invasive practices chill employee whistleblowing, competition, and freedom of speech. Apple's policies have been described as 'notoriously invasive.' Apple has denied the allegations, stating that they are unfounded.
View original story
Slightly improved • 25%
Worsened • 25%
Significantly improved • 25%
Unchanged • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Worsened perception • 25%
Improved perception • 25%
Unchanged • 25%
Worsened • 25%
Improved slightly • 25%
Improved significantly • 25%
Deny allegations • 25%
Settle with Bhakta • 25%
No comment • 25%
Enhance privacy measures • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Decreased trust and sales • 25%
Increased trust and sales • 25%
Neutral impact • 25%
No change • 25%
Increased transparency • 25%
Minor adjustments • 25%
Policy overhaul • 25%
Mostly positive • 25%
Mostly negative • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Launch new privacy features • 25%
Increase marketing on privacy • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Neutral market reaction • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Negative market reaction • 25%
Positive market reaction • 25%
Minor updates • 25%
Moderate changes • 25%
Major overhaul • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Increased public protests • 25%
Other public response • 25%
Public support for surveillance • 25%
Widespread public indifference • 25%
Eliminated DEI efforts • 25%
Maintained current DEI efforts • 25%
Reduced DEI efforts • 25%
Strengthened DEI efforts • 25%
Increased transparency • 25%
Stricter policies • 25%
No changes • 25%
Enhanced privacy measures • 25%