Outcome of Warren's request for Musk's conflict-of-interest rules by December 31, 2025?
Rules established • 25%
No rules established • 25%
Legislative action taken • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Official announcements from the Trump administration or legislative records
Elizabeth Warren Urges Trump to Set Conflict-of-Interest Rules for Elon Musk in DOGE Role
Dec 17, 2024, 06:15 PM
Senator Elizabeth Warren has requested that President-elect Donald Trump establish conflict-of-interest rules for Elon Musk, who is set to serve as a top adviser in the incoming administration. Warren's letter to Trump, made public on Tuesday, expresses concerns about Musk's significant private interests potentially conflicting with his role as an 'unofficial co-president.' Musk, the world's richest man, has been appointed to co-lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a new advisory body aimed at reducing government waste, alongside Vivek Ramaswamy. Warren argues that without clear ethics standards, Musk's involvement could lead to corruption, particularly given his companies' interests in government contracts and regulations. In response, Trump's transition team, through spokesperson Karoline Leavitt, dismissed Warren's concerns, referring to her with Trump's nickname 'Pocahontas' and asserting that the transition team adheres to high ethical standards.
View original story
Rules established • 25%
Request denied • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No Action Taken • 25%
Rules Rejected • 25%
Rules Implemented • 25%
Other Outcome • 25%
Rules implemented • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Investigation initiated • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Mixed opinions with no clear majority • 25%
No significant public response • 25%
Majority oppose Warren's call • 25%
Majority support Warren's call • 25%
Recusal from specific decisions • 25%
No specific rules implemented • 25%
Establishment of a blind trust • 25%
Full disclosure of business interests • 25%
New rules established • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Musk steps down • 25%
No changes made • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Other focus • 25%
Government efficiency • 25%
Regulatory changes • 25%
Technology integration • 25%