Market
Most significant challenge for GAP implementation by 2028?
2
Turkey•Kurdish•Sanliurfa•Southeastern Anatolian Project•GAP•Turkish Lira•Cevdet Yılmaz•GAP Action Plan
Resolution / Starting Odds
Funding • 25%
Infrastructure • 25%
Political • 25%
Other • 25%
Reports from credible institutions or major news agencies analyzing the implementation of GAP
Story
Turkey Unveils $14.11 Billion GAP Plan for Kurdish Southeast, Aiming for 570,000 Jobs by 2028
Dec 29, 2024, 12:57 PM
Turkey has unveiled a $14.11 billion regional development plan aimed at narrowing the economic disparity between its predominantly Kurdish southeast region and the rest of the country. The plan, announced in Sanliurfa, is set to be implemented through the Southeastern Anatolian Project (GAP) by 2028, with the goal of creating over 570,000 jobs. The initiative includes 198 projects, to which a total of 496 billion Turkish Lira will be allocated between 2024 and 2028. Vice President Cevdet Yılmaz described the new GAP Action Plan as a new horizon for the region's future, emphasizing its focus on completing irrigation investments, promoting smart agriculture, tourism-driven growth, and improving the investment environment.
View original story
Similar markets
External interference • 25%
Political disagreements • 25%
Security issues • 25%
Economic constraints • 25%
Public protests • 25%
Legal challenges • 25%
Logistical issues • 25%
Staffing shortages • 25%
Zoning Regulations • 25%
Community Opposition • 25%
Funding Shortfalls • 25%
Construction Delays • 25%
Technical Challenges • 25%
Regulatory Hurdles • 25%
Public Opposition • 25%
Funding Issues • 25%
Technical Limitations • 25%
Data Privacy • 25%
Regulatory Issues • 25%
User Adoption • 25%
Internal military restructuring • 25%
Russian military activities • 25%
Terrorism in North Africa • 25%
Cybersecurity threats • 25%
Data Sharing and Security • 25%
Funding and Resource Allocation • 25%
Political and Diplomatic Tensions • 25%
Intellectual Property Rights • 25%
Data Transmission Issues • 25%
Computational Limitations • 25%
Model Accuracy • 25%
Other • 25%
Security issues • 25%
Infrastructure damage • 25%
Political opposition • 25%
Financial constraints • 25%
User adoption • 25%
Technical issues • 25%
Legal obstacles • 25%
Funding constraints • 25%
Trade Policy • 25%
Environmental Policy • 25%
Immigration Policy • 25%
Foreign Policy • 25%