Most Cited Human Rights Issue in Criticisms of Saudi 2034 Hosting?
Labor rights • 25%
Freedom of expression • 25%
LGBTQ+ rights • 25%
Other • 25%
Media reports and public statements from human rights organizations
FIFA Awards 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia Amid Human Rights Concerns
Dec 11, 2024, 12:23 PM
Saudi Arabia is set to be officially named as the host of the 2034 men's World Cup by FIFA, following a process that has drawn criticism for its lack of competition and transparency. The decision comes amidst concerns over human rights and sportswashing, with Norway planning to protest FIFA's decision by abstaining from the vote. The English FA has announced its support for the Saudi bid, as well as the joint bid by Spain, Portugal, and Morocco for the 2030 World Cup, which also includes celebratory games in Uruguay, Argentina, and Paraguay. The FA's decision to support both bids is expected to lead to near-unanimous global support for the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia. Critics argue that the bundling of the 2030 and 2034 bids means dissent over the 2034 bid would also be dissent over the 2030 bid, potentially influencing European and African countries to vote in favor despite reservations. This decision marks Saudi Arabia's most significant achievement to date in its push for a seat at the top table of global sport, driven by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's massive spending on global sports. Human rights organizations have raised alarms over labor rights, freedom of expression, and LGBTQ+ rights in the country.
View original story
Environmental concerns • 25%
Human rights issues • 25%
Sportswashing accusations • 25%
Other • 25%
Other • 25%
Freedom of expression • 25%
Migrant worker conditions • 25%
Women's rights issues • 25%
Environmental Concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Human Rights Issues • 25%
Migrant Worker Safety • 25%
Human Rights • 25%
Infrastructure Readiness • 25%
Corruption • 25%
Environmental Concerns • 25%
Environmental concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Lack of infrastructure • 25%
Human rights violations • 25%
Supportive stance • 25%
No significant statement • 25%
Increased criticism • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Other human rights issues • 25%
Gender equality issues • 25%
Executions • 25%
Freedom of speech restrictions • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Human rights issues • 25%
Infrastructure problems • 25%
Other • 25%
Alcohol policy • 25%
Other • 25%
Germany • 25%
United Kingdom • 25%
United States • 25%