International Response to U.S. Actions on Greenland by 2025
Condemnation by international bodies • 25%
Support by international bodies • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Other response • 25%
Statements or resolutions from international bodies such as the United Nations or NATO
Denmark Proposes Enhanced Security, U.S. Military Presence in Greenland Amid Trump's Control Aspirations
Jan 11, 2025, 01:49 PM
Denmark has sent private messages to the team of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, expressing readiness to discuss enhancing security in Greenland or increasing the U.S. military presence on the island. The messages, reported by Axios, come in response to Trump's stated interest in securing control of Greenland, which he has described as an 'absolute necessity' for U.S. national security. Denmark aims to address Trump's security concerns without ceding control of the semi-autonomous territory. The Danish government has made it clear that Greenland is not for sale but is open to discussing other U.S. requests regarding the island. This move follows Trump's refusal to rule out military or economic measures, including tariffs against Denmark, to gain control of Greenland. Trump is set to take office on January 20, amid Greenland's ongoing aspirations for independence.
View original story
No significant response • 25%
Support from NATO members • 25%
Opposition from EU members • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Opposed • 25%
No official response • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Support from allies • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Other • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
EU sanctions on U.S. • 25%
No major response • 25%
UN resolution against U.S. • 25%
Other international response • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Critical • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Supportive • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Strong opposition • 25%
Mild concern • 25%
Supportive stance • 25%
No significant international action • 25%
UN intervenes diplomatically • 25%
NATO supports Denmark • 25%
EU issues sanctions against U.S. • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Strong condemnation • 25%
Mild criticism • 25%
Support • 25%
Support from major allies • 25%
Opposition from major allies • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Condemn U.S. actions • 25%
Support U.S. actions • 25%
Call for diplomatic resolution • 25%
Opposed • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Moves toward independence • 25%
Other political change • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Greater autonomy • 25%