How will Australia's energy policy change by 2025 in response to nuclear plan?
Adopt nuclear elements • 25%
Increase renewable targets • 25%
Maintain current policy • 25%
Other changes • 25%
Official announcements from the Australian government
Dutton's $331B Nuclear Plan Promises $263B Savings, Energy Bill Reduction, Despite CSIRO Report
Dec 13, 2024, 01:12 AM
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has unveiled a $331 billion plan to transition Australia's energy grid towards nuclear power, claiming it would be $263 billion cheaper than the government's renewable energy policy. The Coalition's plan involves building seven nuclear reactors at the sites of end-of-life coal-fired power plants, aiming to provide a reliable and consistent energy supply. Dutton argues that this approach will reduce energy bills by 44% and help Australia decarbonize its economy. However, the plan has been met with skepticism from experts and the government. The CSIRO's GenCost 2024-25 report indicates that nuclear energy would be 1.5 to two times more expensive than large-scale solar, and extending coal power station operations would increase carbon emissions. Critics, including Energy Minister Chris Bowen, have dismissed the Coalition's costings as unrealistic, pointing out that the plan underestimates costs, timelines, and the infrastructure needed for nuclear power. The government's plan aims for 82% renewable energy by 2030 and over 90% by 2050, with the remainder from storage and gas.
View original story
Both parties support nuclear • 25%
Labor supports nuclear energy • 25%
Coalition drops nuclear plan • 25%
No change in stance • 25%
Majority oppose nuclear energy • 25%
Majority support nuclear energy • 25%
Evenly split • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Majority oppose nuclear • 25%
Majority support nuclear • 25%
No clear majority • 25%
Opinion evenly split • 25%
On schedule • 25%
Behind schedule • 25%
No significant progress • 25%
Ahead of schedule • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Renewable strategy more cost-effective • 25%
Both equally cost-effective • 25%
Nuclear plan more cost-effective • 25%
Increase by 5-10% • 25%
Increase by over 10% • 25%
No increase • 25%
Increase by less than 5% • 25%
Plan significantly altered • 25%
Plan fully implemented • 25%
Plan partially implemented • 25%
Plan abandoned • 25%