Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitLevel of International Response to Kaokalam Village Landslide by September 30
High-level international response • 50%
Limited international response • 50%
Global media coverage, official statements from international bodies like the UN
Landslide in Kaokalam Village, Papua New Guinea Kills Over 100
May 24, 2024, 04:40 AM
A massive landslide has struck a remote village in Papua New Guinea, resulting in the deaths of over 100 people. The incident occurred around 3 am on Thursday in Kaokalam Village, Enga Province. Local residents and various media reports, including those from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Associated Press (AP), confirm the devastating impact, with homes flattened and many feared dead. Aid groups and local officials are currently assessing the situation. Australian media reported the incident on Friday.
View original story
High coverage • 25%
Moderate coverage • 25%
Low coverage • 25%
No coverage • 25%
No significant response • 33%
Diplomatic condemnation • 33%
Economic sanctions • 34%
Condemnation of Ukraine • 25%
Condemnation of Russia • 25%
Calls for Ceasefire • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation by multiple countries • 33%
No significant international reaction • 34%
Offers of tactical support or intelligence sharing • 33%
No significant response • 33%
Moderate response with statements • 33%
Strong response with actions taken • 34%
Widespread international concern • 25%
Limited reactions • 25%
Calls for investigation • 25%
No significant international response • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Support from US • 25%
Support from Russia • 25%
No significant international response • 25%
No significant international response • 33%
Condemnation without any significant action • 33%
Active intervention or peacekeeping forces deployed • 34%
Broad international support • 25%
Neutral or indifferent reactions • 25%
Criticism from some countries • 25%
No significant international reaction • 25%
UN condemnation • 25%
NATO intervention • 25%
Sanctions on Yemen • 25%
No significant response • 25%
High engagement (new programs/funds) • 33%
Moderate engagement (statements/support) • 33%
Low or no engagement • 34%
Expressions of concern/support • 50%
No significant international response • 50%
Housing • 33%
Infrastructure • 33%
Healthcare facilities • 33%