Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitLeading cause of WATCHMAN FLX™ treatment failure by mid-2025?
Device malfunction • 25%
Patient non-compliance • 25%
Complications during implantation • 25%
Other causes • 25%
Clinical studies and reports from cardiology conferences
OPTION Trial: WATCHMAN FLX™ Device Reduces Bleeding Risk Over 36 Months in Atrial Fibrillation Patients, AHA 2024 Reports
Nov 16, 2024, 07:58 PM
Recent findings presented at the American Heart Association's 2024 conference indicate that left atrial appendage closure, specifically using the Boston Scientific WATCHMAN FLX™ device, may offer significant advantages over traditional oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation. The OPTION trial results reveal that following atrial fibrillation ablation, patients who underwent left atrial appendage closure experienced a lower risk of major bleeding events compared to those on blood thinners. Additionally, the outcomes regarding stroke, embolism, and mortality were found to be noninferior to those receiving oral anticoagulation at the 36-month mark. These findings are supported by other studies, including a randomized trial comparing the WATCHMAN device to anticoagulants, which also showed a reduction in major bleeding without an increase in adverse events. The implications of these results could influence treatment strategies for managing atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients at risk for stroke and bleeding complications.
View original story
Dietary changes • 25%
Increased physical activity • 25%
Smoking reduction • 25%
Improved medical treatments • 25%
Adverse events • 25%
Lack of efficacy • 25%
Cost • 25%
Other • 25%
Mechanical failure • 25%
Patient immune response • 25%
Surgical complications • 25%
Other • 25%
Infection • 25%
Device malfunction • 25%
Rejection • 25%
No major complications • 25%
Alzheimer's Disease • 25%
Parkinson's Disease • 25%
Schizophrenia • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
0-25% • 25%
26-50% • 25%
51-75% • 25%
76-100% • 25%
Logistical challenges • 25%
Regulatory hurdles • 25%
Funding issues • 25%
Other • 25%
Cost • 25%
Regulatory approvals • 25%
Manufacturing capacity • 25%
Public awareness • 25%
Other benefits • 25%
Reduced bleeding risk • 25%
Improved patient compliance • 25%
Lower long-term costs • 25%