Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitInternational response to NY Times report on human shields in Gaza by end of 2024?
United Nations issues a statement • 25%
European Union issues a statement • 25%
International Criminal Court opens investigation • 25%
No major response • 25%
Official statements or actions by international bodies such as the UN, EU, or ICC
NY Times Investigation Reveals Decades of Israeli Troops Using Palestinians as Human Shields in Gaza
Oct 14, 2024, 06:16 AM
A recent investigation by The New York Times has revealed that Israeli troops in Gaza have regularly forced captured Palestinians to carry out life-threatening tasks to avoid putting Israeli soldiers at risk on the battlefield. These tasks include operations inside Hamas tunnels. This practice, which involves using Palestinians as human shields, has been corroborated by both Israeli soldiers and Palestinian former detainees. Credible reports of such actions by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have been documented for decades, including instances involving children.
View original story
Condemnation and sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic pressure without sanctions • 25%
Support for Israel's actions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No Response • 25%
Sanctions against Israel • 25%
Condemnation without sanctions • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Other • 25%
New peacekeeping mission deployed • 25%
Increased sanctions on Israel • 25%
Increased sanctions on Hamas • 25%
Increased humanitarian aid • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Condemnation • 33%
Support • 33%
Neutral • 33%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Formal investigations launched • 25%
Diplomatic statements only • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Call for investigation • 25%
Support for Israel's actions • 25%
No official response • 25%
Economic sanctions on Israel • 25%
Increased humanitarian aid to Gaza • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations for peace • 25%
No significant action taken • 25%
UN Resolution • 25%
Economic Sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic Condemnation • 25%
No Significant Action • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation and sanctions • 25%
Condemnation without sanctions • 25%
Calls for investigations • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
No response • 25%
No significant public reaction • 25%
Majority demand government action • 25%
Majority dismiss the report • 25%
Public protests occur • 25%