Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow will the Supreme Court ruling affect religious exemptions in other states by end of 2025?
Increase religious exemptions • 25%
Decrease religious exemptions • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
Legal changes or legislative measures in other states following the decision
Supreme Court to Decide if Catholic Charities in Wisconsin Can Opt Out of Unemployment Taxes
Dec 13, 2024, 07:54 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case from Wisconsin that could redefine the scope of religious exemptions from state unemployment taxes. Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Superior, in the case of Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission, is seeking an exemption, arguing that its charitable services to the poor, elderly, and disabled are part of its religious mission. The case challenges a 4-3 decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which ruled that Catholic Charities' activities were not 'typical' religious activities because they serve and employ non-adherents and do not attempt to convert participants to the Catholic faith. The Supreme Court's decision could impact how religious organizations are treated under state unemployment compensation systems across the country, potentially allowing religious hospitals, schools, and other institutions to opt out of such programs.
View original story
Decrease in similar laws • 25%
No change • 25%
Increase in similar laws • 25%
Mixed impact • 25%
Decrease in similar laws • 25%
Mixed changes • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increase in similar laws • 25%
No change • 34%
Decrease in states with bans • 33%
Increase in states with bans • 33%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Decrease in states restricting funding • 25%
Increase in states restricting funding • 25%
More states enact similar bans • 25%
No change in other states • 25%
Mixed outcomes across states • 25%
Some states repeal similar bans • 25%
No change in similar bans • 25%
Mixed changes • 25%
Decrease in similar bans • 25%
Increase in similar bans • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Uphold mandate • 25%
Remand to lower court • 25%
Modify mandate • 25%
Strike down mandate • 25%
Ban upheld • 33%
Ban overturned • 33%
Partial ruling • 34%
Mixed reactions • 34%
Predominantly negative • 33%
Predominantly positive • 33%
Weaken shield laws • 25%
No change • 25%
Introduce new laws • 25%
Strengthen shield laws • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Increased financial burden • 25%
Significant financial relief • 25%
Unclear impact • 25%
No significant change • 25%