Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow will public opinion on transgender youth medical care shift by end of 2025 following Supreme Court decision?
Increase in support • 25%
Decrease in support • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed results • 25%
Pew Research Center or Gallup poll results
Supreme Court Hears United States v. Skrmetti, Challenge to Tennessee's Ban on Transgender Youth Medical Care
Dec 4, 2024, 02:00 PM
On December 4, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in United States v. Skrmetti, a pivotal case challenging Tennessee's law banning certain gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors. The law, known as S.B.1 and enacted in 2023, prohibits medical professionals from providing puberty blockers, hormone treatments, and surgeries to individuals under 18 seeking to align with a transgender identity. The case has drawn significant attention and protests outside the Supreme Court, with implications for similar laws in other states, including Florida. Chase Strangio, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the first openly transgender man to argue before the Supreme Court, is representing transgender youth and their parents in challenging the ban. The federal government, represented by Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, has joined the challenge, arguing that Tennessee's law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. During oral arguments, Justice Sonia Sotomayor compared the risks of gender-affirming treatments to those of taking aspirin, while Justice Samuel Alito referenced evidence from the UK and Sweden expressing caution over such treatments. Supporters of the law, including Tennessee's Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti and several Republican lawmakers, argue that the state has the right to protect minors from medical treatments they consider experimental and potentially harmful. They assert that minors should not undergo irreversible medical procedures before reaching adulthood. The outcome of the case could have far-reaching consequences for transgender rights and access to medical care in the United States. The Supreme Court's decision may set a precedent for other states considering similar legislation and impact the legal framework surrounding gender-affirming care for minors.
View original story
Other outcome • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Less supportive • 25%
More supportive • 25%
More supportive • 25%
Polarized • 25%
Less supportive • 25%
No change • 25%
More supportive • 25%
Polarized opinions • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Less supportive • 25%
Significant expansion of rights • 25%
Significant restriction of rights • 25%
Unclear impact • 25%
Minimal impact • 25%
Majority oppose inclusion • 25%
Majority support inclusion • 25%
Evenly split opinion • 25%
No significant data • 25%
Majority support the ban • 25%
No clear majority • 25%
Majority neutral/undecided • 25%
Majority oppose the ban • 25%
Widespread protests • 25%
Legal challenges • 25%
Supportive public demonstrations • 25%
Minimal public response • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Majority oppose the ban • 25%
Other • 25%
Evenly divided opinion • 25%
Majority support the ban • 25%
Mostly opposed • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Mostly supportive • 25%
Minimal public reaction • 25%
Ban upheld • 25%
Ban struck down • 25%
Case dismissed • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Ban struck down • 25%
Ban upheld • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Case remanded to lower court • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No change in similar bans • 25%
Increase in similar bans • 25%
Mixed changes • 25%
Decrease in similar bans • 25%