Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow will international organizations respond to the U.S. aid diversion in Syria by end of 2025?
Condemnation and sanctions • 25%
Increased oversight • 25%
No official response • 25%
Collaboration with U.S. for solutions • 25%
Statements from the United Nations or related international bodies
Syrian National Charged with Diverting $9 Million in U.S. Aid to Al-Qaida Affiliate; 380,000 Meal Kits Diverted
Nov 23, 2024, 02:19 PM
A Syrian national, Mahmoud Al Hafyan, has been charged with diverting $9 million in U.S.-funded humanitarian assistance to a terrorist organization affiliated with Al-Qaida. Al Hafyan, who ran the Syrian division of a nongovernmental organization, is accused of skimming as much as $10 million worth of meals paid for by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). These meals were intended for Syrian refugees but were instead diverted to members of the Al-Nusrah Front, an al-Qaida-linked terrorist group. Federal prosecutors revealed that American taxpayers funded hundreds of thousands of these meals. Al Hafyan allegedly cooked the books to hide the diversions, but two whistleblowers reported him. Authorities stated that 380,000 meal kits were diverted in this scheme, which they described as a shocking abuse of U.S. taxpayers' generosity. Sanjay Virmani, special agent in charge of counterterrorism at the FBI’s Washington field office, commented on the case, highlighting the dual impact of supporting violent terrorists and stealing from U.S. humanitarian efforts.
View original story
Red Cross • 25%
UNICEF • 25%
Doctors Without Borders • 25%
Other • 25%
United Nations • 25%
European Union • 25%
Red Cross • 25%
Other • 25%
Significant increase in humanitarian aid • 25%
Limited international intervention • 25%
New refugee crisis in neighboring countries • 25%
No significant change in international response • 25%
Diplomatic intervention • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No response • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
Humanitarian aid increase • 25%
No significant response • 25%
UN sanctions • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Critical • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Strong support and aid • 25%
Limited support and aid • 25%
No significant support • 25%
Opposition to new government • 25%
Humanitarian aid • 25%
Reconstruction • 25%
Military support • 25%
Political stabilization • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No significant change • 25%
Reduction in aid • 25%
Increased audits • 25%
Third-party monitoring • 25%