Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow will BlackRock's compliance with settlement terms affect investor behavior by end of 2025?
Increased investment in BlackRock • 25%
Decreased investment in BlackRock • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
Investor reports and market analysis
Tennessee, BlackRock Settle ESG Lawsuit With $11.6 Trillion Asset Manager
Jan 17, 2025, 07:30 PM
Tennessee has reached a settlement with BlackRock Inc., resolving a lawsuit that accused the $11.6 trillion asset management giant of misleading consumers about the role of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors in its investment strategies. Filed in December 2023 under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, the lawsuit alleged that BlackRock failed to adequately disclose the extent of ESG considerations in its decision-making and overstated the financial benefits of ESG-related strategies. Under the nine-page settlement, BlackRock has agreed to a range of measures, including increased transparency in proxy voting, third-party audits of compliance, removal of ESG ratings from certain funds, and improved investor communications. The agreement also requires BlackRock to disclose its membership in climate-focused organizations and ensures that non-financial goals are pursued only with explicit investor consent. Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti described the settlement as a precedent-setting move to protect investor interests, stating, "This is a hard pivot for BlackRock. It basically means ESG is dead at the biggest asset manager in the world." The settlement does not include penalties or admissions of wrongdoing by BlackRock but emphasizes reforms to align its practices with investor transparency and accountability.
View original story
No change • 25%
Improved perception • 25%
Mixed perceptions • 25%
Worsened perception • 25%
Increased transparency reported • 25%
Decreased transparency reported • 25%
Mixed outcomes • 25%
No change in transparency • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Strengthening ESG policies • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Weakening ESG policies • 25%
No change in ESG policies • 25%
Decrease over 10% • 25%
Decrease up to 10% • 25%
Increase up to 10% • 25%
Increase over 10% • 25%
Pending • 34%
Rejected • 33%
Approved • 33%
Partnership • 25%
New Product Launch • 25%
No Major Response • 25%
Acquisition • 25%
Complete resolution • 25%
Further complications • 25%
No resolution • 25%
Partial resolution • 25%
Unclear impact • 25%
Worsens market position • 25%
Improves market position • 25%
No change in market position • 25%