Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHow many citations will the AI Scientist system's paper (2408.06292) receive by end of 2024?
Less than 50 • 25%
50-100 • 25%
101-200 • 25%
More than 200 • 25%
Citation records from Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, or similar databases
AI Scientist Sparks Recursive Self-Improvement Debate, Turing Test Suggested
Aug 13, 2024, 11:15 AM
A new system, referred to as The AI Scientist, has been developed to automatically generate scientific papers with novel contributions in machine learning research domains, including language modeling, diffusion, and grokking. This development has sparked discussions about the potential for recursive self-improvement in AI, which could lead to uncontrollable AI and possible risks to humanity. One of the papers, identified as 2408.06292, is 185 pages long. The system's capability has prompted suggestions for the machine learning community to adopt a 'Scientist Turing Test' to distinguish between AI and human-generated research papers.
View original story
0-500 • 25%
501-1000 • 25%
1001-1500 • 25%
1501 or more • 25%
Meta (Llama 3) • 25%
OpenAI (GPT-4o) • 25%
Anthropic (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) • 25%
Other • 25%
Above 50 • 25%
30 - 50 • 25%
10 - 30 • 25%
Below 10 • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
0-5 • 25%
6-10 • 25%
11-15 • 25%
16 or more • 25%
Less than 50 • 33%
50-100 • 33%
More than 100 • 34%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Molmo has fewer citations than GPT-4V • 25%
Molmo has 0-10% more citations than GPT-4V • 25%
Molmo has 10-20% more citations than GPT-4V • 25%
Molmo has more than 20% more citations than GPT-4V • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Other • 25%
Turing Award • 25%
NeurIPS Competition • 25%
ICML Award • 25%