Loading...
Market
Congressional response to Capitol steps ruling by end of 2024
5
Resolution / Starting Odds
Legislation Enacted • 33%
No Legislative Action • 34%
Legislation Proposed But Not Passed • 33%
Legislative records, official communications
Story
Federal Court Strikes Down Pelosi-Era Rule Barring Public Prayer on Capitol Steps in First Amendment Victory
May 17, 2024, 09:47 PM
A federal court has struck down a rule from the Pelosi era that barred public prayer and protests on the steps of the U.S. Capitol. The ruling, which is seen as a significant victory for First Amendment rights, came as a result of a lawsuit filed by Rev. Patrick Mahoney, who was arrested on the Capitol steps in 2021. Prominent civil rights lawyer Harmeet Dhillon and her team at the Liberty Center represented Mahoney in this case. The court's decision underscores the importance of free speech and religious freedom, allowing the public to use the Capitol steps for prayer and protests. This ruling follows a three-year legal battle and has been celebrated by advocates for constitutional rights.
View original story
Similar markets
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No action taken • 33%
Fines imposed • 33%
Usage restrictions or bans • 33%
Increased use of Capitol steps in campaigns • 50%
No significant change • 50%
Legislation Passed Supporting Rules • 33%
Legislation Passed Opposing Rules • 33%
No Significant Legislative Action • 34%
Federal legislation passed • 33%
State legislation passed • 33%
No significant legislative action • 33%
Legislation limiting FTC powers • 25%
Public hearings held • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Resolution supporting FTC • 25%
Introduce new legislation • 33%
File appeal or seek reconsideration • 33%
No immediate action • 33%
New federal law passed • 25%
Amendment to existing laws • 25%
No change in laws • 25%
Repeal of conflicting laws • 25%
No further action • 33%
Formal censure • 33%
New legal action or referral • 33%
Passing new legislation • 33%
Amending existing laws • 33%
No significant action • 34%
Propose new judicial conduct legislation • 33%
Propose changes to SCOTUS funding • 33%
No significant legislative action • 34%
Passes new legislation on gerrymandering • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Calls for Constitutional amendment • 25%
Forms a commission to study gerrymandering • 25%